Abstract

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) in creative industries has introduced significant challenges to traditional frameworks of intellectual property law, particularly in music copyright. AI technologies are now capable of generating music autonomously, raising complex questions regarding authorship, ownership, and the extent of human creativity in music production. This research explores the implications of AI-generated music on existing copyright laws, with a particular focus on how these laws—rooted in human authorship and creativity—are ill-equipped to address the nuances of machine-generated works. The study critically examines the ownership of AI-generated music, the role of human input in the creative process, and the evolving definition of originality and creativity in the digital age. Drawing on case studies, legal precedents, and international copyright frameworks, the research proposes the need for a redefined legal structure to accommodate AI-generated works while preserving the value of human creativity. This paper advocates for a sui generis legal framework or the reinterpretation of existing copyright laws to address the unique challenges posed by AI in the music industry, ensuring that the rights of both human creators and AI technologies are adequately protected. The findings aim to contribute to ongoing legal debates on the intersection of technology, creativity, and intellectual property, providing practical recommendations for lawmakers, musicians, and legal practitioners.